![]() ![]() This question was asked in Federal Parliament on Melbourne Cup day by the Liberal member for Wakefield, South Australia, Mr Bert Kelly, satirising common Australian attitudes to the protection of industry. “Will the minister see what can be done to put a tariff on New Zealand horses in order to prevent them running faster than our home-produced horses?” The Australian Financial Review, November 23, 1976, p. McGuinness, “THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS LAST,” “ What price the housewife on the open market?,” 19/10/00Īppendix: Parallel paragraphs put P.P.McG in good company Continue » “ Why raddled old feminists are wrong on parenting,” 29/8/98Ģ5. “ Old-style families at a financial loss,” 21/9/96Ģ3. ![]() “ Bleeding hearts with tight fists,” 31/8/96Ģ2. “ Machinations of the system,” 21/6/95Ģ1. “ Domestic work holds the key to unemployment,” 22-23/5/93Ģ0. “ Childcare figures reveal zealots behind statistics,” 18-19/7/92ġ8. “ Sacrifices vital to overcoming unemployment,” 11-12/7/92ġ7. “ Unemployed plight the shame of mindless militancy,” 10/7/92ġ6. “ Ideology burdens the state of welfare,” 9/7/92ġ5. “ Older but no wiser on jobless,” 8/7/92ġ4. “ Vested interests leaving young out in the cold,” 7/7/92ġ3. “ We need to make people want to work,” 28/2/92ġ2. “ Why welfare is of poor benefit,” 8/10/91ġ1. “ Homeless used as cannon fodder,” The Australian, March 2, 1989, pp. #KERRY PACKER HOW TO#“ How to create more jobs,” The Australian Financial Review, July 15, 1988, pp. “ Providing proper child-care facilities is the major issue,” The Sun-Herald, June 5, 1988, p. “ Prayers from a Marxist litany,” The National Times, week ending March 24, 1979, p. ![]() “ The poor and the social workers are always with us,” The Australian Financial Review, September 16, 1975, pp. “ Welfare, mainly for social workers,” The National Times, January 13-18, 1975, pp. At least we have Paddy McGuinness to guide us through the thick smug, often displaying his distinctive triple-threat of huge nuance, extreme empathy and sneaky truth-telling:ġ. The mind boggles at so-called “feminist” “modern” “democratic” “welfare lobby” “compassion industry” “Nanny State” policies towards commoditising, subjectifying, entitling, professionalising, bureaucratising, standardising, credentialing, certifying, decreeing, unionising, nationalising, guaranteeing, taxing and subsidising housework, childcare, charity, casual work and employment with benefits. Aren’t forced formalities disparaged as “affectations”? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |